10/20/2004
Microbes Hitching Rides to Mars
Last week we discussed equipment malfunction in the Genesis capsule, which failed to deploy its parachutes and crashed to earth. Now I see that an AP news report by John Antczak posted on AOL News says that backward engineering drawings may have caused the failure! Gemini was equipped with two pairs of gravity switches; each pair was to activate one parachute. With the backward drawings, the switches were placed in the wrong positions. Whether this mistake is responsible for the parachutes not deploying is uncertain and the investigation continues.
In contrast, the Martian rovers Opportunity and Spirit are both performing admirably well beyond the expected times for their demises. The August 6 issue of Science contains 12 papers on the findings of the Spirit rover in the Gusev Crater on Mars. The papers deal with topics such as evidence of water in Mars’ past, wind directions on the planet, erosion of the rocks, compositions and magnetic properties of rocks and dust, etc. We’ll probably end up knowing more about Gusev Crater than we know about most craters here on Earth. One uncontrollable factor that will bring the rovers to a halt will be a buildup of dust on the solar panels that will block the Sun’s feeble rays and power will be lost. Meanwhile, they’re still roaming around supplying mission scientists with data for many more papers in the future.
Genesis’ mission was to sample bits of the Sun via the solar wind, providing clues on the formation of our solar system. Opportunity and Spirit are charged with finding evidence of what happened on one planet well after the solar system formed. Of course, the Holy Grail of any planetary mission would be to find existing life or evidence of life in the planet’s past.
But there are serious questions that must be answered. If there is life on other planets, would we be able to recognize it as life? Are we contaminating Mars with life carried there by our rovers and our orbiters? We’ll see shortly the answer to this question is quite likely to be yes! If this happens, are we seeding life on the planet and could it evolve into something quite different from life here on Earth?
Kasthuri Venkateswaran, of NASA’s biotechnology and planetary protection group, is asking such questions in NASA’s Spacecraft Assembly Facility (SAF) located in the foothills of Pasadena, California. Venkat, as he’s called, looks for bugs, microbes that live on or in the spacecraft being assembled in SAF. I learned of his work in an article by Alan Burdick titled “Seeding the Universe” in the October Discover magazine and found more about the work on the NASA Web site.
It shouldn’t be surprising to find bugs in the SAF. After all, we humans assemble the spacecraft and we’re loaded with all kinds of critters. In spite of all the clean rooms and special gowns and hats and shoes and gloves, we can’t help shedding stuff off our skin, our hair, even off our eyeballs! Efforts are made to sterilize the components of the spacecraft by heating and by chemical treatments but some items, such as printed circuits and electronic devices, don’t take too well to being heated.
Venkat has been surprised by some of the bugs that he and his colleagues have found on their spacecraft. Most are microbes known to thrive in harsh, dry environments found in the nearby deserts but some are new to the biological community. In fact, the speculation is that some of these microbes may have evolved specifically to thrive in the SAF. For example, there’s Bacillus pumilis, which was found on the Mars Odyssey orbiter and on Spirit and Opportunity. B. pumilis actually thrives on traces of aluminum and titanium on the surfaces of the spacecraft! And three strains of B. pumilis have survived treatments in a sterilizer containing hydrogen peroxide vapor.
B. pumilis also resists desiccation by forming spores that aggregate together to form what look like little macaroons. Cut open the macaroons and there’s no evidence of B. pumilis; the microbe just seems to have dissolved into its surroundings. But, add a tad of moisture and B. pumilis is back in business. If life on Mars resembles this microbe, it will take one clever robot to know it’s alive! It isn’t as though the biological community wasn’t aware of B. pumilis. It’s been widely studied for years but Venkat suspects that the SAF version is a new substrain that has evolved to live in the hostile conditions it found in the SAF.
There’s also Bacillus safensis (named for its SAF environment), which appears to be an offspring of B. pumilis. B. safensis is resistant to gamma rays, high doses of which can kill most microbes and can kill us humans. Without the protective atmosphere we have on Earth, Mars is a hotbed of gamma radiation. Bacillus odesseyi is a microbe with a double spore layer that offers it super protection from gamma rays and it’s named after the Mars orbiter Odyssey. B. odesseyi has been circling Mars on its habitat, the Odyssey orbiter, for three years now. Is it still alive? How about B. pumilis on the rovers?
These microbes obviously are hardy critters, with a will to survive under very harsh conditions. Will they manage to clamber down off their rovers or drift down from their orbiters onto the Mars surface? If so, what happens then? Can they evolve to flourish on Mars, perhaps searching out some of that moisture that’s been found either in frost or in hydrated chemical compounds? We’re back where we started. If these microbes we’ve brought along to Mars do evolve and we later find them, will we be able to recognize the evolved microbes as ours or will we be tricked into thinking we’ve found native Martian life?
Hey, if we find any life, even if we’re fooled, it would be life thriving on a world bombarded by radiation, probably devoid of liquid water and with a hostile tenuous atmosphere. To my mind, such a discovery would demonstrate forcefully that some form of life is likely on other planets in other solar systems throughout the universe.
The thought just occurred to me that we should really go back to the Moon to check out the areas where we’ve been. With all the traipsing around that we’ve done on our satellite, we must have shed zillions of microbes. If we revisit those sites, we may find some still living or even evolving to exist in a truly hostile environment. Just a thought.
Allen F. Bortrum
|