06/20/2007
A Really Cold Case
I’m exhausted from just watching those golfers struggle in the horrendous rough at the U.S. Open at Oakmont. Having played one Open course (Baltusrol) shortly after an Open, I can also appreciate the problems putting on Open greens – they were like glass! The experience of watching the final round of the Open on Sunday was enhanced by the presence of our Editor, Brian Trumbore, and our Lamb creator, Harry Trumbore, both of whom share a close kinship with yours truly.
Earlier, on Sunday morning, I watched the TV program Sunday Morning with Charles Osgood. One of the main segments had to do with sugar. It was truly frightening to hear that we Americans on average consume the equivalent of roughly two and a half pounds of sugar a week! One of the culprits is high fructose corn syrup, about which I wrote some years ago. While watching the Open, Brian had his usual Coors Lite while Harry recalled that there was a can of Oranjeboom premium lager in the back of our refrigerator. He was somewhat distressed to find that he had inadvertently opened a similar size can of Arizona Iced Tea.
Having already had my Scotch and orange juice, a drink some scoff at, I graciously said I would have the tea. Unfortunately, I looked at the table of contents and was shocked to find that (a) the can was rated to contain about three servings and (b) there were 24 grams of sugar, as high fructose corn syrup, per serving. On the Sunday Morning segment I had learned that 4 grams of sugar equals one teaspoon. This translates into 6 teaspoons per serving or 18 teaspoons per can! I normally would have drunk the whole can but couldn’t handle it knowing there was that much sugar. No wonder we have an obesity epidemic in this country!
The worries about what we put into our digestive tracts were not the only newsworthy dietary subjects recently. Scientists have been busy figuring out the last food intake by the famed “Iceman”. We’ve written before (11/13/2003) about Oetzi (Otzi with umlaut over the O), the 5200-5300-year-old fellow found frozen and remarkably well preserved in the Alps back in 1991. At the time of my column, the mummy had been probed with all manner of instruments and contents of his intestines had been analyzed. The results showed that Oetzi hadn’t strayed far from his roots in his travels and that he had been done in with an arrow that lodged near his left shoulder.
A brief article in this year’s June 1 issue of Science and an extensive article by Stephen Hall in the July National Geographic describe more recent work, notably by Klaus Oeggl and his team at the University of Innsbruck and by Paul Gostner, Egarter Vigl, Patrizia Pernter and Frank Ruhli at the Central Hospital in Bolzano. Talk about cold cases – they’ve managed to construct a feasible account of the last day and a half of the Iceman’s life.
In 2001, Gostner had taken a portable X-ray unit to the museum in Bolzano where the Iceman is housed under refrigeration. It was then that the stone arrowhead was discovered, making this a murder case. More recently, in 2005, the hospital obtained an advanced multi-slice CT scan machine. The Iceman was scooted by ambulance and a police escort for the 10-minute ride from the museum to the hospital for a quick series of scans. He was then quickly whisked back to his refrigerated residence in the museum before he could thaw out.
Earlier, the proposed scenario for Iceman’s last hours was that, since he had also suffered a hand wound, he had dragged himself up the mountain after a battle of some sort. The new CT scan showed, however, that the arrow had torn a gash in the left subclavian artery, the main artery carrying blood to the left arm. This wound is of a type that would have caused massive bleeding and a quick demise. More careful examination of the hand wound showed it had already begun to recover and was probably a day or more old when the arrow did its dirty work. The freezing weather and the glacial water and ice would act to preserve Iceman for lo these five millennia.
Whoever it was who shot the arrow into his back almost certainly is the one who removed the shaft. Speculation is that this was not just a random killing but one that may have had political overtones. The killer did not take any of the artifacts found with the Iceman, notably a distinct copper-bladed ax that must have had value. Now the postulated scenario is that the Iceman was a person of significance in his village, perhaps a leader of some sort. The healing hand injury indicated a possible confrontation. It appears that the Iceman was leaving the scene of the confrontation when his killer came up from behind and loosed the fateful arrow. If the killer didn’t want to be identified, it makes sense that he would pull out the shaft of the arrow to avoid suspicion. Who knows, they may have hade the Stone Age equivalent of CSI and the unique characteristics of arrow shafts’ makers could have led to the killer. The killer also would not have wanted to be found with such a distinct ax if it were readily associated with the Iceman.
We also know that in the 33 hours prior to his death the Iceman had come down from the mountain, possibly to his village, and then started up the mountain when he was killed. How do we know this? Oeggl and his colleagues looked at the contents of the Iceman’s intestine from three different locations. There is a tree in the higher elevations known as the hop hornbeam that blooms with yellow flowers in the late spring or early summer and the pollen fills the air. The Iceman’s lower intestine showed that he had eaten food containing these pollen grains. Then he traveled down to a lower altitude (the village?) as evidenced by pollen from trees that grew in the lower valley farther up in the intestine. Farther up in the intestine hop hornbeam pollen appears again, indicating he had eaten his last meal going back up the mountain.
The postulated scenario that he had some sort of altercation prior to his murder is substantiated by the fact that he headed back up the mountain with less than full armament. His quiver contained arrows that were not finished and he carried a stalk of yew that was probably destined to be shaped and strung into a longbow. It was as though he had used up his weapons in a fight of some sort or perhaps had to flee leaving his old weapons behind. Iceman may have hoped to regroup and replenish his weapons when he was brought down by his killer.
Stay tuned – with the remarkable sleuthing that’s been going on, I almost wouldn’t be surprised if the scientists end up naming the killer!
Allen F. Bortrum
|