10/14/2004
Taiwan
Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian. Excerpts from two important speeches he gave last Sunday, National Day, marking the 93rd anniversary of the founding of the Chinese Republic by Sun Yat- sen.
While the topic of Taiwan was not raised during any of the U.S. presidential or vice presidential debates, it is potentially as much a hot spot as the Axis of Evil in 2005. In the following, focusing on foreign policy, Chen makes it clear he wants peaceful relations with the mainland and a resumption of peace talks held in 1992. But at the same time, he continues to pound away at Taiwan’s independence, an idea not shared by China, and self- defense. I’ll have ongoing comments on the relationship between the two in my “Week in Review” column.
---
Today, on the 93rd National Day of the Republic of China, we stand here in this solemn and momentous occasion to welcome this day – a glorious day that belongs to our 23 million fellow citizens. Let us wish the nation a happy birthday!
In 2000, Taiwan accomplished its first-ever transfer of power between political parties. The strengths of the people have set into motion the gigantic wheel of national reform and progress. Their determination released Taiwan from the burden and malaise – remnants of the protracted one-party rule from the past – and enabled the dynamic vitality of this young democracy to shine brightly again. The historical significance of this change of administration is more than just the relief of old maladies or burdens. This event lays the very foundation upon which our nation’s stability and future developments can be ensured through persistent, comprehensive, and structural reform. This year, the inaugural speech of my second-term, titled “Paving the Way for a Sustainable Taiwan,” signifies our hope of drawing on the support and strength of the people, so as to lay the permanent cornerstone for sustainable democracy, reforms, humanities, and peace.
As Taiwan’s democratization process continues, we will step-by- step realize the objective of popular sovereignty and completely restore political power to the people. However, our journey down the path of democracy will not end there. The quality of Taiwan’s democracy and the essence of our civic society must be continuously enhanced, and the standard for the constitutional rule of law must be further examined and realized.
During the first half-century of authoritarian rule in Taiwan, freedom, democracy, and human rights were infringed upon. Moreover, defective government policies exploited inequality among different ethnic groups, suppressed certain languages and cultures, and caused discrepancy in national identity. These inequities continue to eat at the heart of Taiwan and can be traced to the political oppression by our past dictatorial government. With our democratization, it follows that Taiwan must face its history with utmost sincerity to bridge the rifts and heal the wounds left behind by the past authoritarian government – through mutual understanding, tolerance, and respect. The furtherance of democracy and creation of civic society will protect the diversity of ethnic cultures and the right to pursue personal development. Together, we will safeguard the fruits of Taiwan’s democracy, freedom, and prosperity; forge a new sense of shared destiny; and vigorously realize the goal of “ethnic diversity and national unity.” .
Ensuring the security of people’s lives and property is the government’s most imperative responsibility. “National security” should be the rhetoric commonly spoken by the whole citizenry. Faced with the mounting threat of force and increasing military preparedness from across the Taiwan Strait, every citizen should develop the awareness that raising Taiwan’s defense capabilities is paramount for maintaining the peaceful status quo across the Taiwan Strait. It is also the foundation that will enable the two sides to pursue dialogue on an equal footing. “Don’t think that the enemy will not come; instead, be ready and prepared.” Everyone understands the logic of this statement. If Taiwan lacks a strong national defense, how can it deter military invasion or prevent the outbreak of war?
We will continue to strengthen the military and enhance our defense capabilities. Such efforts are not to enter an arms race with Beijing, nor do they signal an attempt to provoke China; they are founded entirely on the need for national security and self-defense, as well as the responsibility and duty that we must shoulder to safeguard cross-strait peace and regional stability.
---
[Second speech]
The sovereignty of the Republic of China is vested with the 23 million people of Taiwan. The Republic of China is Taiwan, and Taiwan is the Republic of China. This is an indisputable fact .
Next year, the UN will celebrate its 60th anniversary. At a time when expectations for the reform and consolidation of the UN system rise high in the international community, and a sense of urgency felt for expanding international participation, it is most misfortunate and unfair that the UN – an international organization that vows to adhere to the values of “peace, respect, equality and friendship,” and claims to uphold the “principle of universality of membership” – continues to exclude the 23 million people of Taiwan.
The Resolution 2758 of the 1971 UN General Assembly addresses the issue of representation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in the UN and relevant organizations. However, it never endows the PRC any right to “represent the people of Taiwan.” It is essential that Resolution 2758 should not be wrongly used as an excuse to exclude Taiwan from the UN system. Misusing this resolution to obstruct the participation of Taiwan people not only violates the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and other international human rights principles; it is also the greatest irony to the principle of “universality of membership.” .
It is self-evident that our economic achievements and democratic accomplishments can only prevail if our national security is well ensured. As an old adage goes, “One shall be famished if one awaits indolently for the merciful provision of nature; and one shall be defeated if one relies on others to fight his battle.” Only if we remain resolute in our determination to defend ourselves and build up sufficient defense capabilities can we ensure peace across the Taiwan Strait and security for Taiwan.
The threat of military force poses the greatest “shadows of terror” and “forces of darkness” across the Taiwan Strait. At present, there are more than 600 ballistic missiles targeting Taiwan, and the numbers grow by 50 to 75 missiles each year – a serious threat that neither the Taiwan people nor the international society can afford to look on idly. These “shadows of terror” and “forces of darkness” not only directly threaten the peaceful status quo of the Taiwan Strait, they also undermine regional stability and global security .
Past experiences have shown that military threats and constricting Taiwan’s international space will only further distance people on either side of the Strait. Belligerent and hostile rhetoric simply cannot improve mutual trust and understanding. “Cross-strait relations are not necessarily a zero- sum game, there will never be a winner unless it’s a win-win situation for both sides.” I believe the fourth-generation leadership on the other side of the Strait should be able to fully understand this point.
On many issues, the governments and the peoples on both sides of the Strait hold different views – some of which result from the absence of communication. In light of this, I have, on many occasions, proposed that, based on the existing foundation, both sides should promote the resumption of cross-strait dialogue and communication channel, so as to reduce the gap between the two sides and to construct a foundation of mutual trust. Today, I would like to take the initiative to propose that both sides use the basis of the 1992 meeting in Hong Kong, to seek possible schemes that are “not necessarily perfect but acceptable,” as preparation of a step forward in the resumption of dialogue and consultation.
Any conflict in the Taiwan Strait could result in irreparable damages to the peoples on both sides. Therefore, I propose that both sides should seriously consider the issue of “arms control” and take concrete actions to reduce tension and military threats across the Taiwan Strait. Not too long ago, Taiwan’s initiative to cancel the Han-Kuang military exercise originally scheduled for last September was based on such deliberation. We believe only when both sides are committed to exercising restraint and avoiding any action that might further complicate the situation or induce conflicts, can we ensure that cross-strait relations develop on a peaceful and stable path. In the long term, both sides should formally end the state of hostility across the Taiwan Strait and establish confidence-building measures through consultations and dialogues. Furthermore, we should review the armament policies of both sides and seek to establish the “Code of Conduct across the Taiwan Strait” as the tangible guarantee of permanent peace in the Taiwan Strait.
Source: gio.gov.tw [Taiwan’s government web site]
---
Hott Spotts returns October 21.
Brian Trumbore
|