Stocks and News
Home | Week in Review Process | Terms of Use | About UsContact Us
   Articles Go Fund Me All-Species List Hot Spots Go Fund Me
Week in Review   |  Bar Chat    |  Hot Spots    |   Dr. Bortrum    |   Wall St. History
Stock and News: Hot Spots
  Search Our Archives: 
 

 

Hot Spots

https://www.gofundme.com/s3h2w8

AddThis Feed Button
   

05/05/2005

Lebanon, Part II

As I noted last time I was planning a trip to Lebanon and Beirut.
Well I’m back and I’ll discuss more of the politics of the area in
my 5/7 “Week in Review” column, including my trip to the
Bekaa Valley Hizbollah territory.

For the purposes of this piece, though, I just want to add on to
some remarks I made in the 4/21 “Hott Spotts” concerning
former prime minister Rafik Hariri and his role in helping rebuild
the country following the 1975-90 civil war. In a piece for the
May / June issue of Foreign Affairs, Professor Fouad Ajami
(Johns Hopkins) notes that it will never be proven with certainty
just who was responsible for Hariri’s death.

“It is likely that the trail to Damascus will never be found.
Access to the ‘crime scene’ – Lebanon itself – has been limited,
and Syria’s regime of satraps in Beirut has done its best to
hamper a thorough investigation of the crime.”

Well I can speak to this. I was staying at the Hotel Phoenicia,
right across the street from the February 14 attack. My hotel
suffered severe damage in the horrific explosion that claimed 18
lives and my room faced the damage where the main impact was
felt. Yes, I guess you could say access was limited to the crime
scene as there was a barricade about half a block from the area
manned by a few Lebanese army soldiers. But from my room I
could see there was a way to get even closer, though I didn’t try
it myself. My point being in five days I didn’t see any activity at
the crime scene and it’s supposed to be the work of the UN at
this point. The crumpled cars are still there but no one around
them.

As for Ajami’s assertion that access to Lebanon itself has been
limited false. I had no problem entering the country and
neither did I have a problem going to Baalbek where the last
Syrian troops left on Tuesday, April 26. I was there on Sunday,
May 1 though as I’ll explain in my other column I got cold feet
and didn’t exit my car. Seeing posters of Ayatollah Khomeini
and Hizbollah leader Sheikh Nasrallah, plus hundreds of
Hizbollah flags (with the raised fist and a Kalashnikov), has a
way of doing that.

[Beirut itself, however, was terrific. I had zero problems walking
around and not one person bothered me. The people treated me
very well.]

But back to Hariri, with his death he has become a true martyr
for the cause of Lebanese independence. He deserves
tremendous credit for bringing Lebanon back in the post-civil
war days and through sheer force of personality, as well as his
$billionaire wealth, he rallied the business community into
redeveloping many of the bombed out areas of the city.

Hariri, though, could not have accomplished what he did without
cooperating with the Syrian regime that was running things in
Lebanon through its lackeys in the post-war years. And Hariri’s
main patron was Saudi Arabia (he was a Saudi citizen). As
Fouad Ajami notes, “his ties to the House of Saud ran to the very
heart of the dynasty,” adding, “The Saudis are not given to
expressions of public outrage, but one of their own was struck
down in Beirut (and a) huge contingent of Saudi princes came to
Beirut for Hariri’s funeral.”

There is nothing wrong with Hariri’s Saudi ties – it just needs to
be noted – and while it’s true the Saudis put pressure on Syria in
the aftermath of the assassination to exit Lebanon, at the same
time you won’t find Saudi Arabia publicly stating Syria was
responsible for the killing; that’s just not the way things work in
this region.

In closing, though, I came across an editorial from the April
edition of Lebanon’s business magazine “Executive” by editor-
in-chief Yasser Akkaoui. It pretty well sums up the feelings of
the populace in Beirut. [Yet it’s still far more complicated than
this outside the city, as I’ll spell out in “Week in Review.”]

“Dr. Best, Himmler’s right hand man in the Gestapo, once said,
‘As long as the police carries out the will of the leadership, it is
acting legally.’ That mindset allowed for countless political
arrests and murders, during the period of Hitler’s Third Reich.

“The ghost of our late prime minister confronts us with political
murder at the heart of our national dream. He forces on us the
appalling questions: Of what is our constitution made? What is
our citizenship, and more, our lives, worth? What is the future of
a democracy where leaders can be assassinated under
conspicuously suspicious circumstances while the machinery of
legal action scarcely trembles? How many politically disguised
murders will occur before they are exposed for what they are?

“On repression, Huey Long once said, ‘It will come in the name
of your security – they call it ‘National Security,’ it will come
with the mass media manipulating a clever concentration camp
of the mind. The superstate will provide you tranquility above
the truth, the superstate will make you believe you are living in
the best of all possible worlds, and in order to do so will rewrite
history as it sees fit.’ George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth warned
us, “Who controls the past, controls the future.’

“What took place on February 14 was a coup d’etat. Its most
direct and tragic result – and the subsequent terror bombings
aimed at our retail outlets and industrial zones – was a reversal of
Hariri’s commitment to economic prosperity and a declaration of
war, because war is big business, worth billions a year. Our
prime minister was murdered by a conspiracy to protect a state of
war and all the conveniences and excesses that come with it. It
was a public execution of the free entrepreneurial spirit that was
slowly achieving supremacy over the business of war.

“In reality, however, it is the business of peace that is keeping us
afloat. Riad Salameh, arguably the last of Hariri’s economic
musketeers to still hold public office, watched as the coffers
filled with the rewards of prosperity. Today, he is using these
hard-earned savings – won on the field of economic recovery –
to fight the forces of aggression.

“But the worst of all crimes is when a government murders truth.
If it can murder truth, it can murder freedom. If it can murder
freedom, it can murder our own sons if they should dare to fight
for freedom. There are still enough Lebanese left in this country
to make it continue to be Lebanon. We can still fight
authoritarianism, and when we do that we are not being un-
Lebanese; we are being Lebanese. We are sticking our necks out
and that has to be done, because truth does not come into being
automatically. Individual men and women have to work and
fight to make it happen. As long as our government continues to
be like that, as long as such forces can get away with these
actions, then this is no longer the country in which we were
born.”

I’ve decided Lebanon is the most fascinating place on earth
today, in terms of political science, and you can be sure I’ll
address the topic far more often in the future. While success or
failure in spreading democracy in Iraq is critical to the health of
the entire region, you can make the same argument that it is
equally important Lebanon succeed in winning back its
independence in a democratic fashion. Elections are scheduled
for end of May and various terrorist activities should be expected
to occur beforehand as Syria attempts to thwart the will of the
Lebanese people.

Next Hott Spotts May 12.

Brian Trumbore


AddThis Feed Button

 

-05/05/2005-      
Web Epoch NJ Web Design  |  (c) Copyright 2016 StocksandNews.com, LLC.

Hot Spots

05/05/2005

Lebanon, Part II

As I noted last time I was planning a trip to Lebanon and Beirut.
Well I’m back and I’ll discuss more of the politics of the area in
my 5/7 “Week in Review” column, including my trip to the
Bekaa Valley Hizbollah territory.

For the purposes of this piece, though, I just want to add on to
some remarks I made in the 4/21 “Hott Spotts” concerning
former prime minister Rafik Hariri and his role in helping rebuild
the country following the 1975-90 civil war. In a piece for the
May / June issue of Foreign Affairs, Professor Fouad Ajami
(Johns Hopkins) notes that it will never be proven with certainty
just who was responsible for Hariri’s death.

“It is likely that the trail to Damascus will never be found.
Access to the ‘crime scene’ – Lebanon itself – has been limited,
and Syria’s regime of satraps in Beirut has done its best to
hamper a thorough investigation of the crime.”

Well I can speak to this. I was staying at the Hotel Phoenicia,
right across the street from the February 14 attack. My hotel
suffered severe damage in the horrific explosion that claimed 18
lives and my room faced the damage where the main impact was
felt. Yes, I guess you could say access was limited to the crime
scene as there was a barricade about half a block from the area
manned by a few Lebanese army soldiers. But from my room I
could see there was a way to get even closer, though I didn’t try
it myself. My point being in five days I didn’t see any activity at
the crime scene and it’s supposed to be the work of the UN at
this point. The crumpled cars are still there but no one around
them.

As for Ajami’s assertion that access to Lebanon itself has been
limited false. I had no problem entering the country and
neither did I have a problem going to Baalbek where the last
Syrian troops left on Tuesday, April 26. I was there on Sunday,
May 1 though as I’ll explain in my other column I got cold feet
and didn’t exit my car. Seeing posters of Ayatollah Khomeini
and Hizbollah leader Sheikh Nasrallah, plus hundreds of
Hizbollah flags (with the raised fist and a Kalashnikov), has a
way of doing that.

[Beirut itself, however, was terrific. I had zero problems walking
around and not one person bothered me. The people treated me
very well.]

But back to Hariri, with his death he has become a true martyr
for the cause of Lebanese independence. He deserves
tremendous credit for bringing Lebanon back in the post-civil
war days and through sheer force of personality, as well as his
$billionaire wealth, he rallied the business community into
redeveloping many of the bombed out areas of the city.

Hariri, though, could not have accomplished what he did without
cooperating with the Syrian regime that was running things in
Lebanon through its lackeys in the post-war years. And Hariri’s
main patron was Saudi Arabia (he was a Saudi citizen). As
Fouad Ajami notes, “his ties to the House of Saud ran to the very
heart of the dynasty,” adding, “The Saudis are not given to
expressions of public outrage, but one of their own was struck
down in Beirut (and a) huge contingent of Saudi princes came to
Beirut for Hariri’s funeral.”

There is nothing wrong with Hariri’s Saudi ties – it just needs to
be noted – and while it’s true the Saudis put pressure on Syria in
the aftermath of the assassination to exit Lebanon, at the same
time you won’t find Saudi Arabia publicly stating Syria was
responsible for the killing; that’s just not the way things work in
this region.

In closing, though, I came across an editorial from the April
edition of Lebanon’s business magazine “Executive” by editor-
in-chief Yasser Akkaoui. It pretty well sums up the feelings of
the populace in Beirut. [Yet it’s still far more complicated than
this outside the city, as I’ll spell out in “Week in Review.”]

“Dr. Best, Himmler’s right hand man in the Gestapo, once said,
‘As long as the police carries out the will of the leadership, it is
acting legally.’ That mindset allowed for countless political
arrests and murders, during the period of Hitler’s Third Reich.

“The ghost of our late prime minister confronts us with political
murder at the heart of our national dream. He forces on us the
appalling questions: Of what is our constitution made? What is
our citizenship, and more, our lives, worth? What is the future of
a democracy where leaders can be assassinated under
conspicuously suspicious circumstances while the machinery of
legal action scarcely trembles? How many politically disguised
murders will occur before they are exposed for what they are?

“On repression, Huey Long once said, ‘It will come in the name
of your security – they call it ‘National Security,’ it will come
with the mass media manipulating a clever concentration camp
of the mind. The superstate will provide you tranquility above
the truth, the superstate will make you believe you are living in
the best of all possible worlds, and in order to do so will rewrite
history as it sees fit.’ George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth warned
us, “Who controls the past, controls the future.’

“What took place on February 14 was a coup d’etat. Its most
direct and tragic result – and the subsequent terror bombings
aimed at our retail outlets and industrial zones – was a reversal of
Hariri’s commitment to economic prosperity and a declaration of
war, because war is big business, worth billions a year. Our
prime minister was murdered by a conspiracy to protect a state of
war and all the conveniences and excesses that come with it. It
was a public execution of the free entrepreneurial spirit that was
slowly achieving supremacy over the business of war.

“In reality, however, it is the business of peace that is keeping us
afloat. Riad Salameh, arguably the last of Hariri’s economic
musketeers to still hold public office, watched as the coffers
filled with the rewards of prosperity. Today, he is using these
hard-earned savings – won on the field of economic recovery –
to fight the forces of aggression.

“But the worst of all crimes is when a government murders truth.
If it can murder truth, it can murder freedom. If it can murder
freedom, it can murder our own sons if they should dare to fight
for freedom. There are still enough Lebanese left in this country
to make it continue to be Lebanon. We can still fight
authoritarianism, and when we do that we are not being un-
Lebanese; we are being Lebanese. We are sticking our necks out
and that has to be done, because truth does not come into being
automatically. Individual men and women have to work and
fight to make it happen. As long as our government continues to
be like that, as long as such forces can get away with these
actions, then this is no longer the country in which we were
born.”

I’ve decided Lebanon is the most fascinating place on earth
today, in terms of political science, and you can be sure I’ll
address the topic far more often in the future. While success or
failure in spreading democracy in Iraq is critical to the health of
the entire region, you can make the same argument that it is
equally important Lebanon succeed in winning back its
independence in a democratic fashion. Elections are scheduled
for end of May and various terrorist activities should be expected
to occur beforehand as Syria attempts to thwart the will of the
Lebanese people.

Next Hott Spotts May 12.

Brian Trumbore