07/17/2008
Australia and Climate Change
Australia has been seen as Ground Zero for climate change and recently the nation’s top adviser on the topic, Professor Ross Garnaut, issued an extensive report, “Australia’s Climate Change Challenge.” Following are some of the conclusions, including from an appearance at their National Press Club.
---
From the National Press Club:
“Climate change is a diabolical policy problem .Without early and strong action, some time before 2020 we will realize we have indelibly surrendered to forces that have moved beyond our control.”
“Eighty percent of the emissions growth over the next couple of decades is going to be in the developing countries and much more after that China is the big story in the period ahead.”
“Australians already face large increases in petrol prices and they’ll face large increases in electricity prices whether or not there’s an emissions trading scheme because capital costs have gone up so much, that’s the other side of the resources boom.”
From the report:
The weight of scientific evidence tells us that Australians are facing risks of damaging climate change. The risk can be substantially reduced by strong and early action by all major economies. Without that action, it is probable that Australians, over the 21st century and beyond, will experience disruption in their prosperity and enjoyment of life, and to longstanding patterns in their lives.
There is no doubt about the position of most reputed specialists in climate science, in Australia and abroad, on the risks of climate change. There is strong support for the mainstream science from the leaders of the relevant science academies in all of the major countries. The outsider to climate science has no rational choice but to accept that, on a balance of probabilities, the mainstream science is right.
There are nevertheless large uncertainties in the science. While there is a clear majority view that there are high risks, there is debate and honest recognition of limits to knowledge about the times and ways in which the risk will manifest itself. Every climate scientist has his or her views on some issues that differ from the mainstream in detail .
Climate change is harder than any other issue of high importance that has come before our polity in living memory.
Climate change presents a new kind of challenge. It is uncertain in its form and extent, rather than drawn in clear lines. It is insidious rather than directly confrontational. It is long term rather than immediate, in both its impacts and its remedies. Any effective remedies lie beyond any act of national will, requiring international cooperation of unprecedented dimension and complexity.
While an effective response to the challenge would play out over many decades, it must take shape and be put in place over the next few years. Without such action, if the mainstream science is broadly right, the Review’s assessment of likely growth in global greenhouse gas emissions in the absence of effective mitigation tells us that the risks of dangerous climate change, already significant, will soon have risen to dangerously high levels .
The most inappropriate response would be to delude ourselves, taking small actions that create an appearance of action, but which do not solve the problem. Such an approach would risk the integrity of our market economy and political processes to no good effect.
We will delude ourselves if we think that scientific uncertainties are cause for delay. Delaying now will eliminate attractive lower-cost options. Delaying now is not postponing a decision. To delay is to deliberately choose to avoid effective steps to reduce the risks of climate change to acceptable levels.
---
The good options on mitigation will soon be gone. The extraordinary growth in emissions from the major developing countries, first of all China, means that their early participation in a global agreement on mitigation is essential for success. This conclusion is at odds with the momentum of current international discussions. It may not seem fair to the developing countries, given their stage of development and the history of the international discussions .
Much anxiety was expressed in consultations about the possibility of an unconstrained emissions trading scheme from 2010 generating high and unstable prices in the early years, and this being disruptive for the economy. The Review recognizes that the high fossil fuel prices of 2008, which are likely to continue at least for some time, will force considerable emissions reduction below levels that would otherwise have prevailed in the years of Australia’s Kyoto commitments, between 2010 and 2012 .
The international community is too late with effective mitigation to avoid significant impacts. It may yet fail to put in place substantial mitigation, in which case the challenge of adaptation to climate change will be more daunting. Damage from climate change, perhaps immense damage, is likely to be part of the Australian reality of the 21st century and beyond .
In making their choices, Australians will have to decide whether and how much they value many aspects of the natural order and its social manifestations that have been part of their idea of their country. In the discussion of climate change, much is made of natural wonders – of the Great Barrier Reef .We know that we value them highly, and now we will need to think about whether we are prepared to pay for their preservation .
The Review takes as its starting point, on the balance of probabilities and not as a matter of belief, the majority opinion of the Australian and international scientific communities that human activities resulted in substantial global warming from the mid-20th century, and that continued growth in greenhouse gas concentrations caused by human-induced emissions would generate high risks of dangerous climate change.
A natural carbon cycle converts the sun’s energy and atmospheric carbon into organic matter through plants and algae, and stores it in the earth’s crust and oceans. Stabilization of carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere requires the rate of greenhouse gas emissions to fall to the rate of natural sequestration.
There are many uncertainties around the mean expectations from the science, with the possibility of outcomes that are either more benign – or catastrophic.
---
China has recently overtaken the United States as the world’s largest emitter, and, in an unmitigated future, would account for about 35 percent of global emissions in 2030.
Other developing countries are also becoming major contributors to global emissions growth, and will take over from China as the main growing sources a few decades from now. Under the unmitigated case, developing countries would account for about 80 percent of emissions growth over the next two decades and more after that.
High petroleum prices will not necessarily slow emissions growth, because of the ample availability of large resources of high-emissions fossil fuel alternatives, notably coal .
Continued high emissions growth with no mitigation action carries high risks. These risks would be reduced by ad hoc mitigation, but remain high for some elements. Ambitious global mitigation would reduce the risks further, but some systems may still suffer critical damage .
Growth in emissions is expected to have a severe and costly impact on agriculture, infrastructure, biodiversity and ecosystems in Australia .
The hot and dry ends of the probability distributions, with 10 percent chance of realization, would be profoundly disruptive .
The median temperature and rainfall outcomes for Australia from climate change with unmitigated growth in global emissions – particularly from impacts on infrastructure, agriculture and international terms of trade – may see GDP fall from the reference case by around 4.8 percent, household consumption by 5.4 percent and real wages by 7.8 percent by 2100.
This would represent significant reduction of economic growth and welfare from what it would have been in the absence of climate change .
Extreme economic disruption in developing countries from climate change could exacerbate severe economic effects on Australia .
Climate change is a global problem that requires a global solution.
Mitigation effort is increasing around the world, but too slowly to avoid high risks of dangerous climate change. The recent and projected growth in emissions means that effective mitigation by all major economies will need to be stronger and earlier than previously considered necessary.
The existing international framework is inadequate, but a better architecture will only come from building on, rather than overturning, established efforts.
Sources: garnautreview.org, Sydney Morning Herald
---
Hot Spots returns next week.
Brian Trumbore
|