Stocks and News
Home | Week in Review Process | Terms of Use | About UsContact Us
   Articles Go Fund Me All-Species List Hot Spots Go Fund Me
Week in Review   |  Bar Chat    |  Hot Spots    |   Dr. Bortrum    |   Wall St. History
Stock and News: Hot Spots
  Search Our Archives: 
 

 

Wall Street History

https://www.gofundme.com/s3h2w8

AddThis Feed Button

   

01/14/2005

The Super Bowl and the Market

Super Bowl Quiz:

What was the cost of the top ticket to the first three Super
Bowls? Answer below.

---

I always like to get a jump on all those articles you''ll see
about the impact of football’s Super Bowl on the financial
markets. And, yes, there is also a tie-in with a toy, the Super
Ball.

In the early 1960s, a scientist by the name of Norman Stingley,
working for the Bettis Rubber Co. of Whittier, California, came
up with a compound which he called Zectron. Zectron’s main
property was that it had about six times the bounce of ordinary
rubber.

Well, the folks at Bettis saw no use for it so they gave the rights
to Stingley who then took his product to Wham-O Company, the
same folks who made a fortune on the Hula Hoop and the
Frisbee. The Super Ball, as it was quickly labeled, was released
in 1965 and over the course of the decade some 20 million were
sold.

But what few folks may know is the fact that the Super Ball
ended up becoming the idea for the term “Super Bowl.” The first
four contests between the NFL and the AFL were labeled the
“World Championship Game.” But back in the beginning, the
owners were sitting around trying to come up with a snappier
name when Lamar Hunt, the guiding light of the American
Football League and the owner of the AFL''s Kansas City Chiefs,
remembered watching his daughter play with a high-bouncing
Super Ball a few days earlier and ‘ball’ morphed into ‘bowl.’
Voila. Super Bowl!

[While ‘Super Bowl’ was fairly well accepted right from the
start, all print material, including the actual tickets, said “World
Championship Game.”]

Anyway, when it comes to the Super Bowl and the market, until
the past 6 years the adage was that if a team from the old NFL
won the contest (including AFC entries like the Pittsburgh
Steelers a former NFL team before the merger of the two
leagues), then the stock market would rise. But Denver’s
two victories in 1998 and 1999 put that theory to rest (it being a
traditional AFC squad), as stocks rose 20%+ each year thereafter.

---

Following are the results and the total return of the S&P 500*

1966 .No game -10.1%

1967 Green Bay 35 Kansas City 10 .. +24.0%

1968 Green Bay 33 Oakland 14 +11.1%

1969 New York Jets 16 Baltimore 7 . -8.5%

1970 Kansas City 23 Minnesota 7 . +4.0%

1971 Baltimore 16 Dallas 13 +14.3%

1972 Dallas 24 Miami 3 ... +19.0%

1973 Miami 14 Washington 7 .. -14.7%

1974 Miami 24 Minnesota 7 .... -26.5%

1975 Pittsburgh 16 Minnesota 6 .. +37.2%

1976 Pittsburgh 21 Dallas 17 .. +23.8%

1977 Oakland 32 Minnesota 14 -7.2%

1978 Dallas 27 Denver 10 +6.6%

1979 Pittsburgh 35 Dallas 31 +18.4%

1980 Pittsburgh 31 L.A. Rams 19 . +32.4%

1981 Oakland 27 Philadelphia 10 . -4.9%

1982 San Francisco 26 Cincinnati 21 +21.4%

1983 Washington 27 Miami 17 . +22.5%

1984 L.A. Raiders 38 Washington 9 . +6.3%

1985 San Francisco 38 Miami 16 .. +32.2%

1986 Chicago 46 New England 10 .... +18.5%

1987 N.Y. Giants 39 Denver 20 . +5.2%

1988 Washington 42 Denver 10 +16.8%

1989 San Francisco 20 Cincinnati 16 +31.5%

1990 San Francisco 55 Denver 10 . -3.2%

1991 N.Y. Giants 20 Buffalo 19 +30.6%

1992 Washington 37 Buffalo 24 +7.7%

1993 Dallas 52 Buffalo 17 +10.0%

1994 Dallas 30 Buffalo 13 . +1.3%

1995 San Francisco 49 San Diego 26 +37.4%

1996 Dallas 27 Pittsburgh 17 +23.1%

1997 Green Bay 35 New England 21 +33.4%

1998 Denver 31 Green Bay 24 .. +28.6%

1999 Denver 34 Atlanta 19 ... +21.0%

2000 St. Louis 23 Tennessee 16 -9.1%

2001 Baltimore 34 N.Y. Giants 7 . -11.9%

2002 New England 20 St. Louis 17 .. -22.1%

2003 Tampa Bay 48 Oakland 21 .. +28.7%

2004 New England 32 Carolina 29 .. +10.9%

*Return includes dividends.

And now your “exclusive” conclusions from the editor.

Playing off the popular “over / under” bets that many find so
compelling, check this out.

In each of the 9 years that the S&P 500 finished down, the loser
of the Super Bowl scored fewer than 20 points (17 or less,
specifically), while in each of the 9 years in which the loser
scored more than 20 points, the market finished up.

So, this is where investors should be focusing. Loser over 20,
market is guaranteed to rise ahem. Loser under 20, odds are
31% the market will finish lower. [9 down years in the 29 in
which the loser scored less than 20.]

Of course this is all ridiculous, but it’s the one time a year I have
the opportunity to be so.

And remember, as always, bet with your head not over it.

Sources:

Ibbotson Associates
“Toys!” Don Wulffson

Quiz Answer:

The top ticket price for the first three Super Bowls was $12. [For
the next three it went to just $15.] Last year it was $600 and I
believe it is $700 or $750 for this coming one.

Wall Street History will return January 21.

Brian Trumbore



AddThis Feed Button

 

-01/14/2005-      
Web Epoch NJ Web Design  |  (c) Copyright 2016 StocksandNews.com, LLC.

Wall Street History

01/14/2005

The Super Bowl and the Market

Super Bowl Quiz:

What was the cost of the top ticket to the first three Super
Bowls? Answer below.

---

I always like to get a jump on all those articles you''ll see
about the impact of football’s Super Bowl on the financial
markets. And, yes, there is also a tie-in with a toy, the Super
Ball.

In the early 1960s, a scientist by the name of Norman Stingley,
working for the Bettis Rubber Co. of Whittier, California, came
up with a compound which he called Zectron. Zectron’s main
property was that it had about six times the bounce of ordinary
rubber.

Well, the folks at Bettis saw no use for it so they gave the rights
to Stingley who then took his product to Wham-O Company, the
same folks who made a fortune on the Hula Hoop and the
Frisbee. The Super Ball, as it was quickly labeled, was released
in 1965 and over the course of the decade some 20 million were
sold.

But what few folks may know is the fact that the Super Ball
ended up becoming the idea for the term “Super Bowl.” The first
four contests between the NFL and the AFL were labeled the
“World Championship Game.” But back in the beginning, the
owners were sitting around trying to come up with a snappier
name when Lamar Hunt, the guiding light of the American
Football League and the owner of the AFL''s Kansas City Chiefs,
remembered watching his daughter play with a high-bouncing
Super Ball a few days earlier and ‘ball’ morphed into ‘bowl.’
Voila. Super Bowl!

[While ‘Super Bowl’ was fairly well accepted right from the
start, all print material, including the actual tickets, said “World
Championship Game.”]

Anyway, when it comes to the Super Bowl and the market, until
the past 6 years the adage was that if a team from the old NFL
won the contest (including AFC entries like the Pittsburgh
Steelers a former NFL team before the merger of the two
leagues), then the stock market would rise. But Denver’s
two victories in 1998 and 1999 put that theory to rest (it being a
traditional AFC squad), as stocks rose 20%+ each year thereafter.

---

Following are the results and the total return of the S&P 500*

1966 .No game -10.1%

1967 Green Bay 35 Kansas City 10 .. +24.0%

1968 Green Bay 33 Oakland 14 +11.1%

1969 New York Jets 16 Baltimore 7 . -8.5%

1970 Kansas City 23 Minnesota 7 . +4.0%

1971 Baltimore 16 Dallas 13 +14.3%

1972 Dallas 24 Miami 3 ... +19.0%

1973 Miami 14 Washington 7 .. -14.7%

1974 Miami 24 Minnesota 7 .... -26.5%

1975 Pittsburgh 16 Minnesota 6 .. +37.2%

1976 Pittsburgh 21 Dallas 17 .. +23.8%

1977 Oakland 32 Minnesota 14 -7.2%

1978 Dallas 27 Denver 10 +6.6%

1979 Pittsburgh 35 Dallas 31 +18.4%

1980 Pittsburgh 31 L.A. Rams 19 . +32.4%

1981 Oakland 27 Philadelphia 10 . -4.9%

1982 San Francisco 26 Cincinnati 21 +21.4%

1983 Washington 27 Miami 17 . +22.5%

1984 L.A. Raiders 38 Washington 9 . +6.3%

1985 San Francisco 38 Miami 16 .. +32.2%

1986 Chicago 46 New England 10 .... +18.5%

1987 N.Y. Giants 39 Denver 20 . +5.2%

1988 Washington 42 Denver 10 +16.8%

1989 San Francisco 20 Cincinnati 16 +31.5%

1990 San Francisco 55 Denver 10 . -3.2%

1991 N.Y. Giants 20 Buffalo 19 +30.6%

1992 Washington 37 Buffalo 24 +7.7%

1993 Dallas 52 Buffalo 17 +10.0%

1994 Dallas 30 Buffalo 13 . +1.3%

1995 San Francisco 49 San Diego 26 +37.4%

1996 Dallas 27 Pittsburgh 17 +23.1%

1997 Green Bay 35 New England 21 +33.4%

1998 Denver 31 Green Bay 24 .. +28.6%

1999 Denver 34 Atlanta 19 ... +21.0%

2000 St. Louis 23 Tennessee 16 -9.1%

2001 Baltimore 34 N.Y. Giants 7 . -11.9%

2002 New England 20 St. Louis 17 .. -22.1%

2003 Tampa Bay 48 Oakland 21 .. +28.7%

2004 New England 32 Carolina 29 .. +10.9%

*Return includes dividends.

And now your “exclusive” conclusions from the editor.

Playing off the popular “over / under” bets that many find so
compelling, check this out.

In each of the 9 years that the S&P 500 finished down, the loser
of the Super Bowl scored fewer than 20 points (17 or less,
specifically), while in each of the 9 years in which the loser
scored more than 20 points, the market finished up.

So, this is where investors should be focusing. Loser over 20,
market is guaranteed to rise ahem. Loser under 20, odds are
31% the market will finish lower. [9 down years in the 29 in
which the loser scored less than 20.]

Of course this is all ridiculous, but it’s the one time a year I have
the opportunity to be so.

And remember, as always, bet with your head not over it.

Sources:

Ibbotson Associates
“Toys!” Don Wulffson

Quiz Answer:

The top ticket price for the first three Super Bowls was $12. [For
the next three it went to just $15.] Last year it was $600 and I
believe it is $700 or $750 for this coming one.

Wall Street History will return January 21.

Brian Trumbore