04/18/2002
Nitric Oxide, Hat Birds and Scriabin
If my count is correct, this column is a milestone in that it is my 150th column. In the past 149 columns, we''ve considered some strange things ranging from black holes to the role nitric oxide, NO, plays in Viagra''s use to help improve a man''s sexual performance. In my first column, which dealt with the latter subject, I said that there would be more about NO in future columns, it being such an important compound in the body. In the February Reader''s Digest, there''s a condensation of an article in the Minneapolis Star Tribune by Jon Tevlin illustrating that the potential of NO is still being explored. Jon''s wife, Ellen, was admitted to the hospital to mend a broken ankle by implanting a metal rod. This is a situation I can relate to, having a metal rod implanted near my own ankle after breaking my leg on the golf course - but you already know that story.
However, while in the hospital, Ellen developed a horrible complication known as ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome. In ARDS, blood vessels leak fluid into the lungs and multiple organ failure may result. About 40 percent of the patients die. To make a long story short, Ellen lapsed into a coma and her vital signs deteriorated so badly that, unless something was done quickly, she was about to become one of those 40 percent. Fortunately, the attending doctor had heard of another case like Ellen''s in which a last ditch dose of nitric oxide was administered which rescued that patient. In Ellen''s case, NO and very dedicated nursing care did the trick. A week after receiving NO she opened her eyes. It was nearly a month after lapsing into the coma that she spoke her first words and in another month she came home. I''m pretty sure that NO will come up again in a future column.
For over a year, Ellen and Jon thought about how to thank David, the nurse who had played a key role in pulling her through. Ellen being a dedicated photographer, they finally decided on a photograph taken on a trip that would illustrate her recovery. Strangely, in a tragic footnote, they took the framed picture to the hospital only to learn that David had committed suicide the week before, just a year after he had taken Ellen off the ventilator.
Musical composers sometimes exhibit strange behaviors in their compositions. Indeed, many members of my generation question whether much of today''s popular hits even qualify as "music". This is not to say that the classical music field doesn''t have its share of weird composers. Last week, we went to the last of this season''s Friday afternoon concerts of the New York Philharmonic at Lincoln Center. The conductor was Riccardo Muti, one of the world''s outstanding wielders of the baton and a foremost interpreter of the music of the Russian composer Alexander Nikolaevich Scriabin. But first there was a performance of Schubert''s Sixth Symphony, a pleasant work to which I could tap my toes.
After intermission, it was on to Scriabin''s First Symphony, composed a bit over a hundred years ago. Scriabin was somewhat of a free spirit, according to the program notes. This was apparent when behind the orchestra were seated, by my estimate, some 80 or more members of the New York Choral Artists group under the direction of Joseph Flummerfelt. The men of the chorale were arrayed in tuxedos and the women in black gowns. Two soloists, Larissa Diadkova and Sergei Larin joined them. We were obviously in for a major vocal effort.
It was clear from the start that Scriaban was not a slave to custom in writing this first symphony. Instead of the conventional four movements, he opted for six. Those of you familiar with Scriabin''s First will know what happened. The orchestra performed the first, second, third, fourth and even the fifth movements and the assembled vocalists had not uttered a peep - not a sound! You could see those uncultured members of the audience like myself look at each other during the pauses between movements with questioning looks on their faces. Had these 80 or so formally attired individuals stumbled into the wrong concert hall by mistake? Or were they there to attend some formal reception afterwards?
Finally came movement number six and the two soloists stood up and, in Russian, individually and together, sang for perhaps a total of 4 or 5 minutes and sat down. The orchestra was obviously building toward a rousing conclusion when, suddenly, in perfect unison, the choral group stood up and burst into song! But they only had one line to sing - the Russian equivalent of "Glory to art, forever glory." Admittedly, they repeated this same line in various tonal forms, joining with the orchestra in the expected rousing and really quite impressive finish to the symphony. However, I estimate that the chorus sang a total of maybe three minutes or so. I couldn''t help wondering how much the members of the choral group were paid for those few minutes. Scale, I would imagine.
Last week, I also found it strange that Brian Trumbore had dropped off the 20th anniversary issue of the Smithsonian magazine dated April 1990 with a note suggesting I''d find ideas for a couple of columns. The issue''s theme was the environment. It was interesting to look through the magazine and see what issues were discussed over a decade ago and compare the situation then and now to check the progress being made. Since the theme of this 150th column seems to have become strange things or behavior, I did find an example of an unusual type of behavior. This was in connection with the effort to return endangered species to the wild, in particular, raptors such as the peregrine falcon.
An article by Don Moser described activities at the World Center for Birds of Prey in Boise, Idaho. Moser characterized the peregrine falcon as "the art of bird design carried to perfection." Flying at speeds up to 80 miles an hour and diving at 200 mph, the peregrine is one impressive bird. It''s eyesight is reportedly eight times keener than ours and those eyes can focus like a zoom lens when the falcon is closing in on its prey. Thanks to DDT and other chemicals, the peregrine became extinct in the Eastern U.S. and its population in the West had fallen by 90 percent. The Center, in combination with other institutions through an initiative known as the Peregrine Fund, had released some 3,000 captive-bred chicks into the wild and had established 300 nesting pairs in the wild. The goal was by 1995 to have incubated populations of peregrines in all the regions of the country where the falcons used to live.
To achieve this objective, the Center became a falcon factory, raising peregrines and then releasing them into the appropriate regions of the country. The article describes the effort in detail and it''s not simple. For example, the eggs have to be tended and watched very carefully to ensure that a chick hatches. In particular, the egg must lose a certain amount of its weight by evaporation, 17 percent over a period of 31 days to allow the embryo room to grow into a chick. To achieve a uniform rate of weight loss requires weighing the eggs every three days and adjusting the humidity in the incubator to either speed up or slow down evaporation. When the chick is ready to emerge, it first pecks a hole in the shell in order to breathe. Then, exhausted by the effort, it rests for a couple days and finally starts to peck out a circle in the eggshell to make its way out. There, its first meal is typically a mush, sort of a quailburger made from a species of Japanese quail raised at the center.
Most of the time, the male and female peregrines mate in the Center''s breeding chambers but some falcons aren''t all that receptive and artificial insemination is required. Here''s where the strange behavior comes into play. To obtain the semen for the insemination, a young male is given special treatment. The bird is reared and hand fed by its handler for a period of a month or more. After getting this special attention, the bird considers the handler to be just another falcon. Or maybe the bird considers itself to be a human. Imprinted in this fashion, the peregrine considers another falcon to be some kind of unfamiliar extraterrestrial being. When the peregrine is mature at two or three years of age, the handler and the imprinted male engage in a weird ritual.
In the wild, the courtship ritual involves the offering of food by one partner and the handing it back by the other and then exchanging it again. This courtship ritual is mimicked by the handler, who hands the falcon a piece of quail breast. The falcon takes a feather and gives the quail back to the handler, who then returns it to the peregrine. The peregrine, strangely enough, gets turned on by this food exchange bit and bows its head and cheeps. The dutiful handler bows and cheeps in return and the two keep bowing and cheeping until the falcon is really wound up. The handler then doffs a specially designed hat with a rubber dam on the top to catch the semen. The handler turns his back to the bird, again mimicking the position of a peregrine female ready for action. The peregrine flies onto the hat and consummates this passionate lovemaking with the hat! This is why the imprinted peregrines are known as "hat birds" at the Center.
A search of the Web reveals that the Peregrine Fund is still active and that there are a number of other birds of prey centers involved in the effort to reestablish falcons, eagles and other raptors back into their native habitats. Could it be that the eagle I saw on my last walk on Marco Island was one of those whose existence is due to such laudable efforts? And could it be that the handler himself becomes imprinted after many times spent engaging in those weird sexual acts? Might not he begin to think of himself as a peregrine? Or have I become warped myself after 150 columns? Quite possibly!
Happy birthday to our editor, Brian Trumbore.
Allen F. Bortrum
|