08/10/2005
Membership Applications
Longtime readers may recall that I was heavily involved in editing and writing a centennial history of The Electrochemical Society (ECS), which in 2002 celebrated the 100th anniversary of its founding. Since then, I’ve been the historian of ECS but had not done a bit of work to justify that title until recently, when I joined two of my centennial colleagues in going through old ECS files dating back to 1903. Our task was to see if there were any gems among the many membership applications contained in the files.
I was hoping that we might find Thomas Edison’s application but someone must have beaten us to it. One application, dated April 21, 1922, did grab my attention. The application was from Ernest A. Vuilleumier, who was then head of the Department of Chemistry at Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Well, Vuilleumier not only taught me inorganic and organic chemistry when I attended Dickinson from 1943 to 1946, but his courses reinforced my decision to major in chemistry though I had not taken chemistry in high school. I even did some honors work in organic chemistry under his direction. (I later grew to hate organic chemistry. However, today, as I’ve often stated in these columns, I stand in awe at what organic and biochemists have accomplished.)
I still remember Vuilleumier’s classic demonstration of the difference between hydrochloric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid. He filled two large beakers with the acids and proceeded to dip his hands into the beaker containing the hydrochloric acid. After washing and drying his hands, he proceeded NOT to dip his hands in the sulfuric acid! I don’t recommend that you dip your hands in either acid and you would certainly regret dipping them in the concentrated sulfuric, which has a major affinity for picking up water. The effect would be somewhat akin to charring your hands over an open flame.
I saw an article in the Star Ledger this week that reminded me of one of Vuilleumier’s inventions. The Ledger article pertained to the Breathalyzer used by police to test drivers suspected of having imbibed too much. I remembered that Vuilleumier was also interested in alcohol and found on the Dickinson Web site that in 1923 he invented the Dickinson Alcometer, a device used by the Feds in Prohibition days to determine accurately the alcohol content of illegal booze. I also found that Vuilleumier died in 1958 in the chemistry stockroom while preparing for his chemistry class. I envision that he might have been picking up some bottles of hydrochloric and sulfuric acids.
In searching through the ECS applications, I did find a gem of more general interest, an application from Lee De Forest, who listed his field as invention and research and his specialty as electrical discharge in gases. De Forest accumulated over 300 patents in his lifetime, according to my 1962 World Book Encyclopedia. One of these inventions, his “audion” tube, was one of the most important inventions of the twentieth century. I don’t recall the source but in one biography of De Forest on the Web there’s a picture of De Forest with William Shockley, co- inventor of the transistor. Not only were both the transistor and the audion revolutionary inventions in the communications field but the two devices were also quite similar in their principles and applications. Both De Forest and Shockley were controversial personalities of their times.
It’s hard for me to conceive that many readers may have never seen a vacuum tube, except for the TV tube. Let’s see where De Forest’s invention of the audion tube fits into the picture. Back in 1904, British scientist John Fleming invented the vacuum tube known as a diode. The diode was a glass tube into which were sealed two electrodes; one electrode, the cathode, was like the filament in a light bulb. When a current passed through the wire it became hot, hot enough to drive electrons off the wire. The other electrode was a cold metal plate, the anode. This cold anode was charged positively. The positive electrode attracted the negative electrons. The result was a current of electrons passing through the tube from hot cathode to cold anode.
Fleming found that his diode could detect radio waves. When the signal from an antenna was connected to the anode, the signal would change the voltage on the anode. (The radio waves picked up by the antenna go up and down in voltage, as does AC alternating current.) The voltage changes on the anode either attracted more electrons or repelled them, depending on the sign of the voltage. As a result, the current varied, mimicking the radio wave signal picked up by the antenna.
What De Forest did, in 1907, was to stick a third electrode between the anode and the cathode. This third electrode was called the “grid” and was typically either a metal screen or a coil of thin wire. De Forest found that, by putting a voltage on this grid, he could affect the amount of current going from the anode to the cathode. The grid acted like a Venetian blind but, instead of regulating light, the grid regulated the number of electrons passing from the cathode to the anode. If the grid has a high negative voltage it will repel the negatively charged electrons (likes repel, opposites attract). If you lower the negative voltage, more electrons will pass. De Forest called his tube the audion tube; with its three electrodes, it was also known as a triode.
De Forest’s audion contained some gas, which he thought was necessary. However, others demonstrated that it worked better if it were really a vacuum tube, no gas. This was typical of De Forest’s career. He came up with great ideas but, as one PBS biography puts it, he spent his life “nearly getting it.” A major example of nearly getting it, or getting it too late, was his idea of “feedback” in 1912. If he fed the output signal of his audion back into the input, he increased the strength of a transmitted signal and it could be used in radio transmission. However, he didn’t realize the importance of the idea, sat on it and didn’t apply for a patent until 1915. However, a fellow named Edwin Armstrong had already patented the idea. The audion and its successors with more than three electrodes became the stalwarts of the broadcasting industry.
Well, De Forest sued Armstrong and, in what must be one of the longest patent suits in history, finally prevailed but it was 1934, almost two decades later. Armstrong, the inventor of FM radio, suffered not only that defeat but had endured other trials and tribulations of his own and committed suicide. Despite De Forest’s victory in the patent suit, those in the radio business still credited Armstrong with the idea.
De Forest wasn’t above taking someone else’s idea, notably one of a former colleague, who had the idea that sound could be encoded on a filmstrip along with a motion picture. De Forest tried to sell this idea to the cinema moguls of the time and got a patent in 1924. But the moguls paid no heed and didn’t start making sound movies until 1927 and they didn’t use the approach championed by De Forest. However, later they did switch to the sound on film idea he had suggested.
De Forest considered himself the father of radio and, indeed, in 1910, he made the first broadcast from the Metropolitan Opera, of a performance by Enrico Caruso. He also started radio news broadcasting in 1916 when he incorrectly reported the results of a presidential election. He seems to have been way ahead of his time in that respect! He had many failed business ventures and marriages and never felt that he got his just recognition. He died in 1961 and by then, especially having met with Shockley, must have realized that the transistor was replacing his beloved vacuum tube. The torch was passed.
What was the transistor? In an early form, say an n-p-n transistor, there are three contacts to the three regions. One, the “emitter” emits electrons, like the hot cathode in the audion. Another contact, to the other n-region, is the “collector”, like the cold cathode. The contact to the p region is the “base” and the voltage on the base affects how many electrons flow from the emitter to the collector. The base is similar in its function to De Forest’s grid. The transistor amplifies a signal and performs the same functions as the vacuum tube, only in a vastly smaller space.
Shockley and his co-inventors, Brattain and Bardeen, didn’t suffer from the “nearly getting it” syndrome. I think they “got it” and their Bell Labs colleagues got it. However, Shockley did leave Bell Labs and fail in a business venture and then went on to become involved in controversial matters like donation of his sperm to propagate genius and his proposals about race and intelligence that aroused considerable hostility. On reflection, I guess that all of us at Bell Labs didn’t “get it” in the matter of the integrated circuit, which we discussed recently with the death of Jack Kilby.
Oh, in case you were wondering, we pronounced Vuilleumier VEE-you-may.
Allen F. Bortrum
|